News

Part 1, Article 12.8 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. Driving a vehicle while intoxicated. The court terminated the proceedings due to the lack of evidence.

The defense was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny

Arbitration. Dispute over work on setting up business processes for labeling goods in 1C:Ka2 and data exchange with automated process control systems and GIS MT "Honest sign" in accordance with customer requests.

The representation of interests was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny.

A criminal case was refused against a German citizen by OUR PRINCIPAL under clause "b" of Part 4 of Article 132 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

The defense was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny and lawyer Alexey Nikolaevich Volosyuk.

Arbitration. The court rejected the claim against our clients for compensation for violation of the exclusive right to a trademark in the amount of 5,000,000 (five million) rubles

The interests of the defendants were represented by attorney Boris Andreevich Grozny and attorney Alexander Alexandrovich Burmistrov.

The case under Part 1 of Article 12.26 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation against our client for refusing to undergo a medical examination for intoxication was terminated due to lack of evidence

The defense was carried out by attorney Boris Andreevich Grozny and attorney Alexander Alexandrovich Burmistrov

The criminal case under Part 3 of Article 30, Part 1 of Article 105 of the Criminal Code of the RF against our client has been reclassified by the investigation to paragraph "h" of Part 2 of Article 112 of the Criminal Code of the RF.

The defense was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny.

Krasnoyarsk. Lost the first trial, but won the case. Dispute on protection of honor and dignity, business reputation

The plaintiff was represented by lawyer Boris A. Grozny.

From an unscrupulous client who refused to pay the second part of the fee, the court recovered the amount of debt in the amount of 200,000 rubles and a penalty in the amount of 50,000 rubles in favor of the bar association

Part 3 of Art. 30, Part 4 of Art. 159 and Part 2 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the RF. The criminal case is closed. The preventive measure in the form of detention for OUR CLIENT is cancelled, he is released from custody in the courtroom.

The defense was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny and lawyer Alexander Alexandrovich Burmistrov.

Arbitration. The court satisfied the demands of our client to recover funds in full under the contract for drilling wells, despite the fact that the executive documentation was not presented to the defendant by OUR CLIENT

The plaintiff's interests were represented by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny.

The panel of judges upheld the acquittal of our client under Part 3 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud using one's official position, as well as on a large scale). Having recognized our client's right to rehabilitation

The defense was carried out by lawyer Boris Andreevich Grozny and lawyer Alexander Alexandrovich Burmistrov

The Pushkin City Court satisfied the demands of OUR CLIENT in full, collecting money for undelivered auto parts, a penalty, as well as compensation for moral damage

The interests of the plaintiff were represented by lawyer Groznyi Boris Andreevich

Criminal case under Part 1 of Art. 111 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm. Our client was given a suspended sentence, despite the sanction of the article

The defense was carried out by lawyer Groznyi Boris Andreevich and lawyer Burmistrov Alexander Alexandrovich

In relation to OUR CLIENT, there was a criminal case under Part 3 of Article 30 of paragraph "b" of Part 3 of Article 228.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but in the end the court imposed punishment in the form of compulsory labor

The defense was carried out by lawyers Boris Grozny and Alexander Burmistrov.

The panel of judges overturned the verdict of OUR CLIENT under Part 3 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the criminal case was transferred for a new trial in a different court composition

The defense was carried out by lawyers Boris Groznyi and Alexander Burmistrov.

In initiating a criminal case under paragraph "a, b" part 5 of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and paragraph “a” part 3 of Art. 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation denied due to the lack of corpus delicti

The defense of the principal was carried out by lawyer Grozny Boris Andreevich and lawyer Burmistrov Alexander Alexandrovich

Termination of the criminal case

Какое банкротство выбрать?

Лучшее решение – контролировать!

Установление отцовства или справедливость восторжествовала

Было ваше, стало наше

Точку будет ставить Верховный суд